Imago Dei and AI Governance: Ethical and Theological Challenges in the Age of AI
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Imago Dei, Human Dignity, Ethics, Ethical AIAbstract
This article explores the ethical, theological, and social implications of artificial intelligence (AI) through the lens of Imago Dei—the belief that human beings are made in the image of God. By grounding the analysis in this theological framework, the study addresses the challenges AI poses to human dignity, moral agency, and justice, particularly as AI systems begin to replicate human cognition and decision-making processes. The ethical safeguards proposed in this study—such as regular bias audits, algorithmic transparency, and human oversight—are critically examined not only through secular ethical frameworks but also through Imago Dei, which emphasizes the intrinsic worth and moral responsibility of every individual. These safeguards differ from secular frameworks by insisting on a moral foundation, rooted in the protection of human dignity, social justice, and equity. Theological insights from Imago Dei inform practical applications in AI governance by guiding policy recommendations that call for the rectification of historical injustices, the incorporation of ethical review boards combining secular and religious perspectives, and the design of AI algorithms that prioritize equity, justice, and compassion. This study argues that integrating Imago Dei into AI policy can reshape regulatory actions, influence algorithmic designs, and ensure that AI systems actively promote human flourishing, social justice, and moral responsibility, rather than perpetuating inequality or dehumanization.
References
Adamson, G., Havens, J. C., & Chatila, R. (2019). Designing a value-driven future for ethical autonomous and intelligent systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(3), 518-525. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2884923
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2022). Machine bias. In K. Martin (Ed.). Ethics of data and analytics: Concepts and cases (pp. 254-264). Auerbach Publications.
Asdi, A., Xiaofei, Y., & Marseli, M. (2024). Religious diversity and AI: The role of the Catholic Church in interfaith dialogue. The role of the Catholic Church in the era of AI technology and social issues, 1(1), 48-60. Stipas Publisher. https://publisher.stipas.ac.id/index.php/pbs/article/view/77/76
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of economic perspectives, 29(3), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1257/je p.29.3.3
Barth, K. (2003). Church dogmatics: Vol. 2. The doctrine of God. Part 2. The election of God. The Command of God. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Boddington, P. (2017). Towards a code of ethics for artificial intelligence. Cham: Springer.
Bonhoeffer, D. (1995). Ethics. Simon and Schuster.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & company.
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 77-91. PMLR.
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press.
Dastin, J. (2022). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. In K. Martin (Ed.). Ethics of data and analytics (pp. 296-299). Auerbach Publications.
Dignum, V. (2020). Responsibility and artificial intelligence. In M. D. Dubber, F. Pasquale, & S. Das (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI (pp. 214-230). Oxford Academic.
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.
Floridi, L. (2023). The ethics of information: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641321.001.0001
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Schafer, B. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Gunkel, D. J. (2018). Robot rights. MIT Press.
Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S, Wang Y, Dong Q, Shen H, Wang Y. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2(4), 230-243. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101
Hashmi, S. H. (2002). Islamic ethics in international society. In S. H. Hashmi (Ed.). Islamic political ethics: Civil society, pluralism, and conflict (pp. 148-172). Princeton University Press.
Hauerwas, S. (1991). The peaceable kingdom: A primer in Christian ethics. University of Notre Dame Press.
Johnson, D. G. (1993). Book excerpt: Computer ethics, by Deborah G. Johnson. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 23(3-4), 10-14.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
O'Donnell, J. J. (2012). Augustine confessions: Vol. 1. Introduction and text. Oxford University Press.
OECD. (2019). OECD AI principles. OECD Publishing.
Peters, T. (2018). Imago Dei, DNA, and the transhuman way. Theology and Science, 16(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2018.1488529
Rahner, K. (1979). Foundations of Christian faith: An introduction to the idea of Christianity. Religious Studies Review, 5(3), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0922.1979.tb00215.x
Rainie, L., & Anderson, J. (2017). The future of jobs and jobs training. Pew Research Center.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A modern approach. Pearson.
Shahriari, K., & Shahriari, M. (2017). IEEE standard review—Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human wellbeing with artificial intelligence and autonomous systems. In S. Dunne, & E. Kvernstad (Eds.). 2017 IEEE Canada International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC) (pp. 197-201). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IHTC.2017.8058187
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2020, April). Energy and policy considerations for modern deep learning research. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 34(9), 13693-13696. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i09.7123
Teixeira, I. S. (2015). Aquinas' Summae Theologiae and the moral instruction in the 13th century. Acta Scientiarum. Education, 37(3), 247-257. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasci educ.v37i3.23509
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford University Press.
Wolterstorff, N. (2008). Justice: Rights and wrongs. Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yoonil Auh, Chanmi Kim (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
